Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 14:59:15 12/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2005 at 07:34:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 16, 2005 at 07:31:12, adam wilks wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>Considering Rybkas author is an International Master(IM). Is it logical to >>conclude that implementing chess knowledge in to his engine is somewhat easier >>and less tedious job than Stefan, Fabien, Chrilly, Amir, Ed, Robert ect or is >>there a programming skills tradeoff? If Kasparov learnt chess programming and >>used his knowledge to effect would we expect his engine to be top of the ratings >>? It`s only the author`s first version and the 3000 elo barrier is surely >>expected to be broken by future Rybka versions. Unless Junior 10 or Tiger 16 >>beat Rybka to it. Is there going to be a Junior 10 or Tiger 16 out ? >> >>regards. > >I think that more interesting competition is between rybka and fruit and not >between rybka and Junior or rybka and tiger. > >Uri I think this particular competition has already been proven. In my recently posted test, albeit of Fruit 2.1, Rybka 32 bit did not even use a book, and it beat Fruit 2.1. I don't see advantage of seeing a competition where there appears to be hardly any. No need to hype people up. Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.