Author: Bahram Namjou
Date: 15:17:44 12/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
THanks for the detail...It would be good to re-analyze this game by H10 under stable condition...bn On December 18, 2005 at 18:05:48, Harvey Williamson wrote: >On December 18, 2005 at 17:59:18, Bahram Namjou wrote: > >>If H10 was in ahead in his calcuations that he was going to win then why it has >>time trouble? Could it be related to H10 possible bug? or related to different >>PC power in this particular game?...thank you...bn >> >> >No it was not a bug - the position at the end you will see is very complicated. >hiarcs came out of book much later than DJ8 and was behind on the clock. The 2 >server crashes did not help Hiarcs(and of course DJ8)would have lost all hash >tables. At the restart move 28 - Hiarcs would have played a different move in >the original game I think ...Ba5 from memory. > >Of course DJ8 had a hardware advanyage it was using 2 CPUs. Hiarcs was on quite >fast hardware a FX55 at 2600. I think DJ8 was on 2x2200 > >Best wishes > >Harvey
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.