Author: Harvey Williamson
Date: 15:19:28 12/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2005 at 18:17:44, Bahram Namjou wrote: no problem I will look at it when I have time below I should have said Hiarcs came out of book earlier than DJ8. >THanks for the detail...It would be good to re-analyze this game by H10 under >stable condition...bn > >On December 18, 2005 at 18:05:48, Harvey Williamson wrote: > >>On December 18, 2005 at 17:59:18, Bahram Namjou wrote: >> >>>If H10 was in ahead in his calcuations that he was going to win then why it has >>>time trouble? Could it be related to H10 possible bug? or related to different >>>PC power in this particular game?...thank you...bn >>> >>> >>No it was not a bug - the position at the end you will see is very complicated. >>hiarcs came out of book much later than DJ8 and was behind on the clock. The 2 >>server crashes did not help Hiarcs(and of course DJ8)would have lost all hash >>tables. At the restart move 28 - Hiarcs would have played a different move in >>the original game I think ...Ba5 from memory. >> >>Of course DJ8 had a hardware advanyage it was using 2 CPUs. Hiarcs was on quite >>fast hardware a FX55 at 2600. I think DJ8 was on 2x2200 >> >>Best wishes >> >>Harvey
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.