Author: Greg Simpson
Date: 16:09:20 12/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2005 at 17:59:15, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On December 16, 2005 at 07:34:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 16, 2005 at 07:31:12, adam wilks wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>Considering Rybkas author is an International Master(IM). Is it logical to >>>conclude that implementing chess knowledge in to his engine is somewhat easier >>>and less tedious job than Stefan, Fabien, Chrilly, Amir, Ed, Robert ect or is >>>there a programming skills tradeoff? If Kasparov learnt chess programming and >>>used his knowledge to effect would we expect his engine to be top of the ratings >>>? It`s only the author`s first version and the 3000 elo barrier is surely >>>expected to be broken by future Rybka versions. Unless Junior 10 or Tiger 16 >>>beat Rybka to it. Is there going to be a Junior 10 or Tiger 16 out ? >>> >>>regards. >> >>I think that more interesting competition is between rybka and fruit and not >>between rybka and Junior or rybka and tiger. >> >>Uri > >I think this particular competition has already been proven. In my >recently posted test, albeit of Fruit 2.1, Rybka 32 bit did not even >use a book, and it beat Fruit 2.1. > >I don't see advantage of seeing a competition where there appears to >be hardly any. No need to hype people up. > >Stuart If that's the standard, it seems the only testing left to do with Rybka is against quads or better. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.