Author: Josie Wells
Date: 21:29:03 12/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2005 at 00:19:04, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >On December 19, 2005 at 00:09:33, Josie Wells wrote: > >>On December 18, 2005 at 23:51:29, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >> >>>On December 18, 2005 at 23:43:44, Josie Wells wrote: >>> >>>>On December 18, 2005 at 23:30:22, K. Burcham wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Fruit is full of acid. >>>>> >>>>>Rybka has small very sharp teeth. >>>>> >>>>>Choose your weapon. >>>>> >>>>>Either will win a match against any GM. >>>>> >>>>>kburcham >>>> >>>> >>>>not any Grandmaster? 1. Kasparov ? 2. Kramnick 3 Gelfand 4 Leko these can >>>>atleast draw or prevail? >>> >>>I think u r from those categories who think >>>1) Anand 2) Topalov 3) Swidler 4) Ponomariov are useless. >> >>?????? >???????????????? >Kasparov - has good chances against Rybka. >Kramnik - Has good chances ?????? >Gelfand - can survive? (No where near top as yet) >Leko - Depends on form >Anand - has no chances agnst Rybka (If he had,u would hv included him in the >list) >Topalov - can barely survive (according to u since he was also not in ur list) >Ponomariov - has no chances (played very badly agnst computers recently ????) >Swidler - Anyday he is better than Gelfand OH ok now I see your point. No there was alot I didn't list, I only listed a few players that came to mind that I think can take the top. Gelfand is really solid. He may not be in the top but I think he would be good against computers.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.