Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 22:29:19 12/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2005 at 00:29:03, Josie Wells wrote: >On December 19, 2005 at 00:19:04, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: > >>On December 19, 2005 at 00:09:33, Josie Wells wrote: >> >>>On December 18, 2005 at 23:51:29, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >>> >>>>On December 18, 2005 at 23:43:44, Josie Wells wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 18, 2005 at 23:30:22, K. Burcham wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Fruit is full of acid. >>>>>> >>>>>>Rybka has small very sharp teeth. >>>>>> >>>>>>Choose your weapon. >>>>>> >>>>>>Either will win a match against any GM. >>>>>> >>>>>>kburcham >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>not any Grandmaster? 1. Kasparov ? 2. Kramnick 3 Gelfand 4 Leko these can >>>>>atleast draw or prevail? >>>> >>>>I think u r from those categories who think >>>>1) Anand 2) Topalov 3) Swidler 4) Ponomariov are useless. >>> >>>?????? >>???????????????? >>Kasparov - has good chances against Rybka. >>Kramnik - Has good chances ?????? >>Gelfand - can survive? (No where near top as yet) >>Leko - Depends on form >>Anand - has no chances agnst Rybka (If he had,u would hv included him in the >>list) >>Topalov - can barely survive (according to u since he was also not in ur list) >>Ponomariov - has no chances (played very badly agnst computers recently ????) >>Swidler - Anyday he is better than Gelfand > > > >OH ok now I see your point. No there was alot I didn't list, I only listed a few >players that came to mind that I think can take the top. Gelfand is really >solid. He may not be in the top but I think he would be good against computers. ok sorry for the misunderstanding. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.