Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 04:23:51 12/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2005 at 06:55:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 19, 2005 at 06:53:45, Harvey Williamson wrote: > >>As Rybka does not have its own book it is very difficult to create an anti Rybka >>book. Also the H10 book was finished before the small bird had flown into the >>scene! > >right. but the style is anti-rybka. and since rybka is anti-shredder, >i guess the style will also kill shredder, but even heavier then rybka. >how nasty. I can't follow this logic. We say engineA is an anti-engineB, when engineA is very good at exposing the weak parts of engineB. So if engineA knows very well how to expose the weaknesses of engineB and engineB knows very well how to expose the weaknesses of engineC, i don't see why the weaknesses of engineC have to be a subset of the weaknesses of engineB. Since this generally is not true then i don't think your logic is true also.....
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.