Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:15:49 12/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2005 at 06:42:15, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On December 19, 2005 at 06:34:46, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>> Hi Thorsten
>> Good performance of Hiarcs 10 so far. I hope you
>> will post the final result after 50 games -:)
>> Best regards
>> Kurt
>
>before i continue the match against rybka, i first try out s9, fruit2.2.1
>etc.
Hi Thorsten
What a pity: 13 games vs S9, Fruit 2.2.1 etc but then we
still know almost nothing about real strength of Hiarcs 10
due to the meaningless number of games -:)
Best regards
Kurt
>
>i do not think that after 50 games the results will be any different then now.
>look in some of the games and you will see that hiarcs10 plays superior.
>of course i can be wrong.
You can of course be (totally) wrong. I can say
this from my own experience after only 13 games -:(
Kurt
>
>if we want to predict what will happen to s9, i guess it will be a complete
>mess for s9 against THIS hiarcs10.
I could very well imagine that Hiarcs 10 - as most
new engines - are tuned against Shredder 9 and the
result may for this reason be of not much significance.
Kurt
>will it win 1 point ? or lose to sero ?
>
>you are right. we need more games.
>
>but it looks convincingly so far.
>
>i did not play with original books.
>with rybka because there is no book that comes with the ß,
>and with hiarcs i wanted to avoid the people who post that this result
>was due to a killer book. hiarcs9.ctg cannot be a killer book because it was
>published BEFORE rybka.
It is still my hope that this time we shall get
a good book for Hiarcs 10 because the previous
books have not been adapted very well to the
playing style of Hiarcs (just my two cents)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.