Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:30:59 12/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2005 at 13:15:49, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >but then we > still know almost nothing about real strength of Hiarcs 10 > due to the meaningless number of games -:) this is nonsense kurt. YOU believe that one knows nothing. its your believe. > You can of course be (totally) wrong. I can say > this from my own experience after only 13 games -:( > Kurt we will see. i don't believe that i am wrong. > I could very well imagine that Hiarcs 10 - as most > new engines - are tuned against Shredder 9 and the > result may for this reason be of not much significance. > Kurt of course s9 was for the first time a target, but then it was fruit/toga and f9. > It is still my hope that this time we shall get > a good book for Hiarcs 10 because the previous > books have not been adapted very well to the > playing style of Hiarcs (just my two cents) > Kurt i guess you should give this to the book author. i do not believe in books.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.