Author: blass uri
Date: 22:25:27 03/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 1999 at 00:05:27, Mark Young wrote: >On March 27, 1999 at 23:38:40, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On March 27, 1999 at 16:40:35, odell hall wrote: >> >>> >>> A Fide Master on Icc told me that After playing hiarcs7 Several games, he >>>believed that it has a realistic chance of defeating yermo. This Same Fide >>>master stated that the program has a very good grasp of positional chess, and >>>that yermo may suffer shell shock similiar to that of Kaspy. >> >>I disagree >>I looked at the ssdf games Hiarcs7-Fritz5 and found that Hiarcs7 has sometimes a >>bad grasp of positional chess. > >In some position any player human or computer will misjudge the position, this >happens to GM Kasparov at times, but computers programs make the correct >position judgement. This does not make me say Kasparov has a bad grasp of >positional chess. For Hiarcs7 most of the time then not it understands the >positional aspect of a position, and does so more times then most programs. So I >can not disagree with the Fide Master. > >> >>If yermo find the way to lead Hiarcs7 to these positions then he can win >>convincingly. > >That is where the skill of Yermo comes in...to find a way. Will a 2600 GM have >the skill to win convincingly against a top program. My guess is no.. I do not know but I hope that he has the skill. one of the problems in this match that Yermo get money for winning the match and not for winning every game so if yermo leads 3.5:1.5 then the last game is not very important for him. > >What is your standard of winning convincingly? I think anything over 4 points >for the GM is winning convincingly. I agree that 4.5 points or more for the GM is winning convincingly Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.