Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs7 Might just Surprise Everyone! /WHY

Author: Bert Seifriz

Date: 22:54:23 03/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On March 28, 1999 at 00:00:56, Peter Kappler wrote:

>On March 27, 1999 at 23:47:01, Bert Seifriz wrote:
>
>>On March 27, 1999 at 16:40:35, odell hall wrote:
>>

SNIP

>There are a few important differences.
>
>First, Kasparov has never lost a game (publically, anyway!) to a commercial
>program at 40/2 time controls.  He has lost some exhibition games, but only at
>faster time controls (G/30 or faster).

Well, this is not true. 2-3 years ago Kasparav played against
Genius 4 or 5 highly officially with other Grandmasters in a
tournament in London and was very angry when he lost. Maybe it
was a rapid tournament though. Our friend Ossi Weiner can send
you a picture, because he was the operator!
(It is Sunday and I have no time to look for all the old files.)

>
>The Aegon tournaments have seen some GMs lose to commercial programs, but even
>those games were not 40/2.  (Sorry - can't remember the time control...)

If you cannot remember, how do you know that they were not 40/2???
In fact they were, and a lot of Grandmasters lost against simple
software on slow machines at that time. As far as I know it was
GM Christiansen (USA) who lost against M-CHESS (USA) at least 5 years
ago, and that was the first full tournament game a GM had ever lost!!

>
>Yermolinsky is not just an "average" GM.  As recently as 1 or 2 years ago, he
>was on the FIDE top 20 rating list.

What abou Rebel-Yussupov. Is Yussupov a weak player?
>
>Finally, this is a six-game match, and not just a single encounter.

This is possibly the only difference. But when Hiarcs wins
congratulations to Mark Uniacke and Intel - but a sensation it would
be not!
Nice Sunday, Bert



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.