Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:32:06 12/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2005 at 00:53:06, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 19, 2005 at 19:41:50, Chessfun wrote: >>You had previously a couple of years ago complained about Hiarcs 9 default >>settings and saying yours were stronger and could IIRC beat Shredder 8. >> >>Do you feel this way about Hiarcs 10 now that its default isn't as strong as the >>other top engines, lets say Shredder 9? >> >>Sarah > > >i guess the default is stronger than s9 and fruit2.2.1 but not stronger than >rybka. >the style tries to help with this. Some notes: 1)Note that you did not test rybka 64 bit that is faster(I do not blame you for this but it is possible that the picture could be better for rybka with the 64 bit version). 2)Note that rybka is only an early version when we can expect improvement in rybka1.2 The bottom line is that I expect that people who buy rybka are going to have something better than hiarcs10. Based on my observation the main weaknesses of rybka are that in some cases it does not understand endgames or king safety. I understood that the first weakness is going to be solved in Rybka1.2 and we can expect rybka1.2 in february 2006. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.