Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:27:33 12/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2005 at 04:32:06, Uri Blass wrote: >Some notes: > >1)Note that you did not test rybka 64 bit that is faster(I do not blame you for >this but it is possible that the picture could be better for rybka with the 64 >bit version). of course. but i have no 64 Bit hardware. mainly i am sceptical concerning Windows for 64 Bit. >2)Note that rybka is only an early version when we can expect improvement in >rybka1.2 yes. >The bottom line is that I expect that people who buy rybka are going to have >something better than hiarcs10. :-)) maybe. >Based on my observation the main weaknesses of rybka are that in some cases it >does not understand endgames or king safety. here hiarcs is better. yes. >I understood that the first weakness is going to be solved in Rybka1.2 and we >can expect rybka1.2 in february 2006. i see. but - don't you think mark could react on this too ?! its a tug of war. best wishes... thorsten
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.