Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:34:17 12/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2005 at 05:27:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 20, 2005 at 04:32:06, Uri Blass wrote: > >>Some notes: >> >>1)Note that you did not test rybka 64 bit that is faster(I do not blame you for >>this but it is possible that the picture could be better for rybka with the 64 >>bit version). > >of course. but i have no 64 Bit hardware. mainly i am sceptical concerning >Windows for 64 Bit. In my case My hardware is good enough but I do not have windows for 64 bits. > > > >>2)Note that rybka is only an early version when we can expect improvement in >>rybka1.2 > >yes. > > >>The bottom line is that I expect that people who buy rybka are going to have >>something better than hiarcs10. > >:-)) > >maybe. > > >>Based on my observation the main weaknesses of rybka are that in some cases it >>does not understand endgames or king safety. > >here hiarcs is better. yes. > >>I understood that the first weakness is going to be solved in Rybka1.2 and we >>can expect rybka1.2 in february 2006. > > >i see. >but - don't you think mark could react on this too ?! > >its a tug of war. > >best wishes... >thorsten Maybe he can react but we never saw in the past big improvement in hiarcs in a short time and rybka is very young so I predict rybka to be better. I think that the main program to compete against rybka is fruit(also a program of a programmer that improved very much in a short time). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.