Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 06:12:15 12/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2005 at 05:24:55, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On December 20, 2005 at 10:12:54, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >> >>>My Nunn2 testing, as published here at CCC, suggests that the SP (slightly >>>positional) setting might yield slightly better results. My sample is not large, >>>160 games for each setting, and doesn't include the VT setting at all. >>> >>> Albert >>> >> >>Hi Albert, >> >>Wilhelm Hudetz played a lot of Blitz games with the settings and those also >>indicate that SP might be the strongest. So far not tested in CEGT 40/40. >> >>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitz.html >> >>Best Regards >>Heinz > >Heinz (and Albert), > >thanks very much for testing this. I will put this data together when we are >deciding about Rybka 1.2. > >I can add that VP can be at most 6 or 7 rating points better than SP, while >there isn't really any limit going in the other direction. SP performs an >additional "tactical check" which causes a slowdown of around 10-12%. > >Vas Hi Vas, testing continues with the main settings. Just started for the Rybka versions including 64-bit are 50 games matches against Hiarcs 10. The 64-bit version will also start in the leagues (start date January, 3rd) and will be top favourite, although we have to wait to see how Hiarcs 10 performs. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.