Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 08:22:57 12/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2005 at 10:24:00, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >1 Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit SP 2924 38 37 376 78.6 % 2698 15.7 % >… >4 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit 2837 15 15 1582 69.3 % 2695 28.3 % > >87 points between 64bit SP and 32bit VP !!! > >The full strengh of Rybka has been underestimate with the default (32 bits VP), >I think ! > > >On December 20, 2005 at 10:12:54, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >> >>>My Nunn2 testing, as published here at CCC, suggests that the SP (slightly >>>positional) setting might yield slightly better results. My sample is not large, >>>160 games for each setting, and doesn't include the VT setting at all. >>> >>> Albert >>> >> >>Hi Albert, >> >>Wilhelm Hudetz played a lot of Blitz games with the settings and those also >>indicate that SP might be the strongest. So far not tested in CEGT 40/40. >> >>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitz.html >> >>Best Regards >>Heinz Hi Vincent, yes, we will see how the 64-bit version will do in the 40/40 match against Hiarcs 10. Hiarcs took the lead here, but very few games played. Hiarcs 10 vs. Rybka 1.0 Beta-64bit (3:2) Hiarcs 10 vs. Deep Shredder 2CPU 512MB (2,5:2,5) Hiarcs 10 vs. Fruit 2.2.1 (3,5:1,5) Seems that I am the first CEGT tester who got the Hiarcs DVD. So the others will also start matches in the next days. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.