Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer Cheaters

Author: Steve Lopez

Date: 07:23:27 03/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On March 28, 1999 at 10:03:08, David Dawson wrote:

>On March 27, 1999 at 10:58:51, Steve Lopez wrote:
>
>>
>>BTW, I should have mentioned in my last post that I've tried to get
>>Fischer-clock games at 20/10 and that's considered horribly slow by the majority
>>of the players on the servers I frequent. I find this odd -- to me, this seems
>>to be playing at a pretty good clip. I'm not a big fan of one minute initial,
>>one second increment time controls -- if I want to play pinball, I'll head down
>>to the corner tavern.
>>
>>-- Steve Lopez
>
>The reason for this is that 20/10 is enough time to analyse using a computer
>during the game. Then the person can mix his moves in with the computer's
>moves... IE, when the position becomes "positional" in nature, the human takes
>over for a few moves, but when things heat up tactically, the guy allows the
>computer to find the correct combination.
>
>When you play 1 1 chess you're pretty much guaranteed that your opponent is a
>human.

And you're also pretty much guaranteed that you're not playing chess, either,
IMHO.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.