Author: Vladimir Xern
Date: 02:00:07 12/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2005 at 04:00:34, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On December 21, 2005 at 22:59:20, Vladimir Xern wrote: > >>On December 21, 2005 at 17:40:54, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>I've analyzed this game with Rybka beta w32 and strangely the move 14 chosen by >>>Rybka almost immediately is not 14...Nc6-e5, but ...Nh5-f4. >>> >>>w.b.r. >>>Otello >> >>Rybka was going to play Nf4 with a positive score until around after 8 seconds >>of thought when it failed low and switched to Ne5. At least this happens on my >>machine. Probably something to do with the hash history? > >Don't misunderstand me, but sometimes in this forum we've seen not so high elo >ranked people posting victories against strong engines and so the suspect that >they have peeked to the analysis line of the engine and/or take back the moves >is quite strong....so we are usually a bit skeptical about these victories. > >This "human driven" games cannot happen in case of on-line games as in playchess >or icc (like in Pablo games) where there is an anti-cheat control. > >w.b.r. >Otello Yes, just like the automatic suspicion that Rybka was a Fruit clone. Only natural that people were to think so... :) Of course, there's no need to peek at the analysis or take back moves. Just keep playing the same opening where Rybka is weak ad infinitum and try out different moves until you win. It's a good thing I only need to post victories; I don't think the forum has the bandwidth for me to post all of my losses. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.