Author: Andrew Walker
Date: 15:30:30 12/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2005 at 11:22:57, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >On December 21, 2005 at 10:24:00, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >> >>1 Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit SP 2924 38 37 376 78.6 % 2698 15.7 % >>… >>4 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit 2837 15 15 1582 69.3 % 2695 28.3 % >> >>87 points between 64bit SP and 32bit VP !!! >> >>The full strengh of Rybka has been underestimate with the default (32 bits VP), >>I think ! >> >> >>On December 20, 2005 at 10:12:54, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >> >>> >>>>My Nunn2 testing, as published here at CCC, suggests that the SP (slightly >>>>positional) setting might yield slightly better results. My sample is not large, >>>>160 games for each setting, and doesn't include the VT setting at all. >>>> >>>> Albert >>>> >>> >>>Hi Albert, >>> >>>Wilhelm Hudetz played a lot of Blitz games with the settings and those also >>>indicate that SP might be the strongest. So far not tested in CEGT 40/40. >>> >>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitz.html >>> >>>Best Regards >>>Heinz > >Hi Vincent, > >yes, we will see how the 64-bit version will do in the 40/40 match against >Hiarcs 10. Hiarcs took the lead here, but very few games played. > >Hiarcs 10 vs. Rybka 1.0 Beta-64bit (3:2) >Hiarcs 10 vs. Deep Shredder 2CPU 512MB (2,5:2,5) >Hiarcs 10 vs. Fruit 2.2.1 (3,5:1,5) > >Seems that I am the first CEGT tester who got the Hiarcs DVD. So the others will >also start matches in the next days. > >Best Regards >Heinz Can you please comment on what is on the DVD. I'm especially interested in how many endgame tablebases are included, and what other engines. And especially how they fill up the DVD!! Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.