Author: Robert Hollay
Date: 23:40:16 12/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 02:38:28, Robert Hollay wrote: >On December 23, 2005 at 02:14:33, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On December 23, 2005 at 00:44:26, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 22, 2005 at 22:15:18, Peter Kappler wrote: >>> >>>>On December 22, 2005 at 20:33:50, Zappa wrote: >>>> >>>>>A different view: >>>>> >>>>>Hydra, too weak to show at Paderborn >>>>>Zappa, the best thing since sliced bread >>>>>Fruit, proving once again that KISS works. >>>>>Toga II, the clone of fruit with literally 50 lines changed that people somehow >>>>>credit as a real engine >>>> >>>>And isn't it true the the author of Toga initially tried to claim that the code >>>>was 100% his? >>> >>>I do not remember such claim. >>>Did he claim that he wrote 100% of the code? >>> >>>There is a difference between claiming nothing and claiming that the code is >>>100% your code. >>> >> >>Uri, he let the testers believe they were testing an original program. He only >>admitted the truth after they confronted him with a mountain of evidence that >>his program was a Fruit clone. If they hadn't discovered the truth, one has to >>wonder if he ever would have admitted it himself. >> >>He changed 50 lines out of 15,000, and we're supposed to consider it a separate >>engine, different enough from Fruit that it deserves a new name? No way. >> >>-Peter > > >Joachim admitted that Toga is not his original work, and this topic was >already discussed to death. I don't understand why should it be warmed up >again and again. Toga is another fork of Fruit now, open-source, strong, >free, and we should be happy to somebody trying to develop it further. > >Robert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.