Author: Andrew Dados
Date: 13:10:21 03/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 1999 at 16:03:08, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >I'm impressed with the performance of CM6K, although I believe that the first >position is somewhat overrated. I think between place 5-10 is more realistic. >And that's an upgrade already from my former opinion, rating it somewhere >between place 5-15. > >I played Fritz5.32 against CM6K at a fixed ply depth and they drawed. But Fritz >5.32 only took 2 minutes and CM6K took an hour (59 minutes) to complete the >game. I know that node speed isn't everything there is, but given the same >tactical insight the fastest engine will be the best. Or are there different >opinions? > >My system is a P2@400MHz with 128Mb SDRAM. > >Jeroen ;-} Playing different engines at fixed ply depth makes little sense if at all, imo - it's like racing cars at fixed rpm... -Andrew_
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.