Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 13:19:58 03/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 1999 at 14:29:45, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On March 28, 1999 at 14:10:51, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>The relation is in GambitSoft >> >> THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers >> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363 >> 1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457 >> 3 Hiarcs 7.0 64MB P200 MMX 2567 28 -27 676 63% 2471 >> 4 Nimzo 99 64MB P200 MMX 2565 37 -35 390 63% 2472 >> 5 Fritz 5.0 PB29% 67MB P200 MMX 2564 24 -23 946 67% 2436 >> 6 Junior 5.0 64MB P200 MMX 2543 30 -29 576 63% 2447 >> 7 Hiarcs 6.0 48MB P200 MMX 2524 25 -25 802 57% 2473 >> 8 Nimzo 98 57MB P200 MMX 2523 24 -23 899 59% 2459 >> 9 Rebel 9.0 46MB P200 MMX 2522 25 -24 843 62% 2437 >> 10 Rebel 8.0 46MB P200 MMX 2507 31 -30 533 58% 2448 >> 11 MChess Pro 6.0 41MB P200 MMX 2506 28 -28 637 57% 2453 >> 12 MChess Pro 7.1 42MB P200 MMX 2505 24 -24 834 56% 2460 >> 13 Shredder 2.0 57MB P200 MMX 2502 25 -25 765 55% 2464 >> 14 Genius 5.0 DOS 44MB P200 MMX 2495 24 -23 883 56% 2449 >> 15 MChess Pro 8.0 64MB P200 MMX 2481 30 -29 560 53% 2456 > >Why is the number in the last column < 2400 for CM6K and > 2400 for everything >else? > >bruce The games vs. CM6000 have been played manually. It's likely that CM6000 played a lot of dedicated machines, which are weaker than the top echelon of PC software. So the average rating of CM6000's opponents is pretty low. Of course, you can check the SSDF site to see the exact match breakdown. Dave Gomboc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.