Author: Jasmine Baer
Date: 19:17:58 12/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 22:13:27, Chessfun wrote: >On December 23, 2005 at 22:10:24, Jasmine Baer wrote: > >>"is there any reason to select 6 minutes? instead of 5'? or this is just >>arbitrary and which book?...thanks, bn" >> >>6+0 because that is a close approximation to playing a 3+0 game on a place like >>playchess.com. Lots of people there like 3+0 games, and with ponder "off" I >>figure that 6+0 is like playing a 3+0 game with each engine being able to think >>during the other's move. > >Since you have a dual why didn't you simply play ponder=on at 3/0 that would >then have given you your playchess conditions? > >Sarah. Good question. I will be playing Nunn matches with other engines, some of which are dual threaded. I felt it would be easiest to maintain consistency by going with ponder "off." Surely you don't expect me to think TOO much? :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.