Author: Jasmine Baer
Date: 19:31:57 12/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 22:24:22, Chessfun wrote: >On December 23, 2005 at 22:17:58, Jasmine Baer wrote: > >>On December 23, 2005 at 22:13:27, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On December 23, 2005 at 22:10:24, Jasmine Baer wrote: >>> >>>>"is there any reason to select 6 minutes? instead of 5'? or this is just >>>>arbitrary and which book?...thanks, bn" >>>> >>>>6+0 because that is a close approximation to playing a 3+0 game on a place like >>>>playchess.com. Lots of people there like 3+0 games, and with ponder "off" I >>>>figure that 6+0 is like playing a 3+0 game with each engine being able to think >>>>during the other's move. >>> >>>Since you have a dual why didn't you simply play ponder=on at 3/0 that would >>>then have given you your playchess conditions? >>> >>>Sarah. >>Good question. I will be playing Nunn matches with other engines, some of which >>are dual threaded. I felt it would be easiest to maintain consistency by going >>with ponder "off." >> >>Surely you don't expect me to think TOO much? :-) > >Actually that does show a lot of thought. Running dual thread engines on a dual >can be a pain to make sure they are set for single thread. Especially engines >not identified as dual like Shredder 7 etc. > >I must have ordered my copy in some strange place since it isn't even due to >ship till the 28th. > >Sarah. The place I buy from is in Texas, and they always seem to get things on time and shipped quickly. Would I be in violation and in need of "moderation" if I mentioned the vendor?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.