Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit (40'/40) After 650 games (Match vs Pro Deo 1.1

Author: enrico carrisco

Date: 02:34:20 12/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 24, 2005 at 04:18:12, Ryan B. wrote:

>On December 24, 2005 at 04:09:50, Heinz van Kempen wrote:
>
>>On December 24, 2005 at 03:35:08, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>In our 5moves 40'/40 test with matches of 50 games each,
>>>Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit has so far beaten all other engines.
>>>No exception made Pro Deo 1.1 by loosing with 13,5-36,5
>>>giving Rybka a winning score of 73 %.
>>>
>>>Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit against
>>>
>>>25,5-24,5 (51 %) vs Toga II 1.1
>>>27,5-22,5 (55 %) vs Fruit 2.2.1
>>>28,5-21,5 (57 %) vs Fritz 9
>>>32,5-17,5 (65 %) vs Ruffian 2.1.0
>>>33,0-17,0 (66 %) vs Spike 1.0a Mainz
>>>34,0-16,0 (68 %) vs Junior 9
>>>34,0-16,0 (68 %) vs Shredder 9 UCI !!
>>>35,0-15,0 (70 %) vs Loop List 600
>>>35,5-14,5 (71 %) vs Gandalf 6.0
>>>36,0-14,0 (72 %) vs Hiarcs 9
>>>36,5-13,5 (73 %) vs Pro Deo 1.1
>>>38,0-12,0 (76 %) vs The King 3.33 !!
>>>39,0-11,0 (78 %) vs Aristarch 4.50
>>>
>>>Details, Games, Download and Rating List as usual on
>>>our homepage, the corresponding links are:
>>>
>>>Rating list 5moves 40'/40: ______ http://www.utzingerk.com/rating_5moves.htm
>>>
>>>Rybka test __________ (650 games) http://www.utzingerk.com/rybka10beta_test.htm
>>>
>>>Fritz 9 test ________ (750 games) http://www.utzingerk.com/fritz9_test.htm
>>>
>>>Toga II 1.1 test ____ (550 games) http://www.utzingerk.com/toga2_11_test.htm
>>>
>>>Shredder 9 UCI test _ (800 games) http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm
>>>
>>>Fruit 2.2.1 _________ (800 games) http://www.utzingerk.com/fruit221_test.htm
>>>
>>>Loop List 600 _______ (700 games) http://www.utzingerk.com/list600_test.htm
>>>
>>>Spike 1.0a Mainz test (800 games) http://www.utzingerk.com/spike10a_test.htm
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>Kurt
>>
>>Hi Kurt,
>>
>>the name Rybka definitely is a joke. It´s a killer shark. I do not dare to guess
>>where it will be with improved endgame.
>>
>>Best Regards
>>Heinz
>
>The endgame knowledge in Rybka is very good.  The claim of no endgame knowledge
>was just easier than explaining the distance to mate bug.  I think fixing the
>bug will help some but not as much as people think.
>
>Ryan

I would say that there are a few more problems that just the mate bug.  ;)  The
game below is just an example -- I've seen many happen the same way.  Rybka is
white in the example below:

[Event "ICC 3 1"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2005.12.24"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Blargh"]
[Black "gixxer"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ICCResult "Game drawn by repetition"]
[WhiteElo "3029"]
[BlackElo "3059"]
[Opening "Sicilian: Richter-Rauzer, Rauzer attack, 7...a6"]
[ECO "B66"]
[NIC "SI.29"]
[Time "05:23:18"]
[TimeControl "180+1"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 a6 8.
O-O-O h6 9. Be3 Be7 10. f4 Bd7 11. h3 b5 12. Bd3 Nxd4 13. Bxd4 b4 14. Ne2 e5
15. Be3 Qa5 16. Kb1 O-O 17. g4 exf4 18. Bxf4 Be6 19. b3 d5 20. e5 Ne4 21.
Bxe4 dxe4 22. Nd4 Rfd8 23. Qg2 Bd5 24. Nf5 Bf8 25. Nd6 f6 26. Nxe4 fxe5 27.
Bxe5 Bxb3 28. axb3 Qxe5 29. Rde1 Rac8 30. Rhf1 Qd5 31. Rf5 Qc6 32. g5 hxg5
33. Rxg5 Re8 34. Rg4 Re6 35. Rf1 Rce8 36. Rf2 Kh8 37. Rh4+ Rh6 38. Rxh6+
Qxh6 39. Rf5 g6 40. Rf6 Kg7 41. Qf2 Kg8 42. Qg3 Kg7 43. Qc7+ Kh8 44. Qc6 Rd8
45. Rxg6 Qf4 46. Rg5 Qf7 47. Ka2 a5 48. Rg4 Bg7 49. Ng5 Qf5 50. Ne6 Rd2 51.
Nxg7 Qxc2+ 52. Qxc2 Rxc2+ 53. Ka1 Rc3 54. Ne8 Rc6 55. Rg2 Re6 56. Nc7 Re5
57. Kb2 Kh7 58. Rd2 Kg6 59. Nd5 Kg5 60. Rg2+ Kf5 61. Nb6 Kf4 62. Nc4 Rh5 63.
Rd2 Ke4 64. Nd6+ Kf3 65. Rd3+ Kf2 66. Ne4+ Kg2 67. Nd2 Kf2 68. Nc4 Rc5 69.
Rd4 Kf3 70. h4 Rh5 71. Kc2 Kg3 72. Ne3 Rc5+ 73. Kb2 Re5 74. Nf1+ Kg2 75. Nd2
Kg3 76. Kc2 Rh5 77. Ne4+ Kg2 78. Nf6 Rc5+ 79. Rc4 Rf5 80. Ne4 Rh5 81. Rc5
Rxh4 82. Rg5+ Kh2 83. Nd2 Rh8 84. Rxa5 Rb8 85. Kd3 Kg3 86. Ke3 Kg2 87. Rg5+
Kh3 88. Nc4 Kh4 89. Rg1 Rb7 90. Ne5 Kh3 91. Kf3 Kh4 92. Kf4 Kh3 93. Rg3+ Kh4
94. Rg2 Kh3 95. Rg8 Rc7 96. Rg3+ Kh4 97. Rg1 Kh3 98. Rg4 Ra7 99. Rg3+ Kh4
100. Nf3+ Kh5 101. Rg5+ Kh6 102. Nd4 Ra1 103. Nf5+ Kh7 104. Ke5 Ra3 105.
Rg7+ Kh8 106. Rg3 Ra6 107. Rg4 Rb6 108. Rg1 Rb8 109. Rg3 Kh7 110. Kd6 Rb5
111. Rg5 Ra5 112. Ke6 Rb5 113. Rg7+ Kh8 114. Ra7 Kg8 115. Rd7 Ra5 116. Nd6
Ra3 117. Kf6 Ra1 118. Rd8+ Kh7 119. Nf5 Ra6+ 120. Rd6 Ra7 121. Re6 Ra1 122.
Rc6 Ra7 123. Rd6 Rc7 124. Kg5 Rb7 125. Rd4 Ra7 126. Rd3 Rc7 127. Rd1 Ra7
128. Rh1+ Kg8 129. Kf6 Ra6+ 130. Ke7 Ra7+ 131. Kd6 Ra3 132. Rh4 Rxb3 133.
Ke6 Rb1 134. Kf6 Rf1 135. Rxb4 Rf2 136. Rb5 Rf1 137. Rb6 Kh7 138. Rb7+ Kh8
139. Rb8+ Kh7 140. Rb7+ Kh8 141. Rb8+ Kh7 142. Rb7+ Kh8 143. Rb8+
{Game drawn by repetition}
1/2-1/2




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.