Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 10:38:30 12/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 2005 at 11:08:43, Charles Roberson wrote: > > Stuart, > > I looked it over. Looks nice and well thought out. > However, it is a tuner and it takes effort to base > an evaluation function on it. I implemented a simplified > version some years ago for NoonianChess and it made my > program worse. I tried tweaking NoonianChess' eval parameters > based on the parameters it has and it made it worse. > > I must admit this is just my results. Done differently > maybe it would have made it better. > > Also, a paper was published in the ICCA journal on the tuning > efforts using the code. Refer to ICCA Journal Vol. 20 No. 4 December > 1997, T.S. Anantharaman: Evaluation Tuning for Computer Chess: Linear > Discrimination Methods. > > It is a very good read. The conclusions are interesting and some > are obviously good areas to pursue. > > Charles Charles - thanks - do you mind if I post your post to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chesstune/ ? Stuart
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.