Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:26:37 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 07:05:31, JNoomen wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 05:36:14, Uri Blass wrote: > > >>I guess that shredder is going to use more than one processor and together with >>better book it is going to be enough to score more than rybka. > >Ah Uri, you do not have much faith in my book!? I think that you did not have enough time to prepare a book that is good enough because rybka is too new. The commercial version of rybka is clearly similiar to the version that is going to be used. This is not the case with fruit or shredder. > >>rybka has the disadvantage of being too known so it may be easier for opponents >>to prepare against it. > >Rybka is known for a few weeks, Shredder and Fruit much longer :-). I bet Zappa >is the least known, nobody could test against it. Yes This is one of the reasons that I predicted first place for zappa. > >>I expect preperation of sandro against fruit to fail because of significant >>improvements in fruit so I guess Fruit is going to be number 2 and not Shredder. > >Don't underestimate Sandro :-)) > >Jeroen We are going to see but it is a problem to prepare against something that is unknown and I do not blame him if he does not predict fruit's weaknesses in order to choose opening that fruit is relatively weaker than shredder in it. I think that sandro did good preperation in the past and shredder could win world championships inspite of not being the strongest program based on the ssdf list. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.