Author: gerold daniels
Date: 05:32:44 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 06:02:29, Bo Persson wrote: >On December 25, 2005 at 20:14:21, Jasmine Baer wrote: > >>On December 25, 2005 at 19:58:16, gerold daniels wrote: >> >>>On December 25, 2005 at 18:57:37, Dadi Jonsson wrote: >>> >>>>On December 25, 2005 at 18:47:01, Fernando Villegas wrote: >>>> >>>>>Some alternatives has been examined, but at last it seems the weight of habitude >>>>>will get the upper hand. >>>>>Lot of people simply does not want even to listen of any change in this. >>>> >>>>I think I know what you are saying and its not good. At least I tried to offer >>>>something much better, but since others don't agree so be it. >>>> >>>>>As they say: if it is not broken....etc >>>> >>>>But it is badly broken. >>> >>>I don't think it is broken. I like it the way it is. >>> >>>Gerold. >> >>The horse and buggy were pretty cool, too. :-) > > >But some of us have been doing this for 7 years (or soemting). > >It's not just because we are old and stupid, that we have kept it the way it is >- clean and simple. It's because it just works. We can concentrate on the >content, not the form. > >You don't have to be "modern", just because you can. Adding more colors, fancier >fonts, more graphics, or threads moving around, doesn't seem like an improvement >to me. > > >Bo Persson I Agree. Gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.