Author: Chessfun
Date: 09:12:55 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 11:59:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 11:00:41, Chessfun wrote: > >>On December 26, 2005 at 05:33:40, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Hi Tony >>>In our Ryba test 40'/40 Gandalf 6.0 got 14.5/50 >>>http://www.utzingerk.com/rybka10beta_test.htm >>>Best regards >>>Kurt >> >>Rybka? you mean Fruit 2.2.1 surely? > >He meant rybka against gandalf. > >>In which case Gandalf scored 11/50 or 22% >>Here Gandalf scores 29% > >I do not know how did you get 11/50(maybe Kurt also tested Gandalf6 against >fruit and got that result but I did not check it and kurt did not post about it) Yes that was the result, which was why I wondered since I can see no relationship between the score of Gandalf v Rybka and v Fruit. >> >>Then aside from the differences in time controls you naturally have the >>difference in books, autoplayer and learning. So I am not too sure even were the >>% the same what to make of the post? >> >>Sarah. > >The comparison of course proves nothing because the condition is different but >gandalf6 in kurt test against rybka scored better than gandalf6 against >Fruit2.2.1 in the ssdf games. Yes but again as you stated since the testing conditions are totally different it proves nothing, therefore what is the point? Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.