Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 10:53:10 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 06:02:29, Bo Persson wrote: >On December 25, 2005 at 20:14:21, Jasmine Baer wrote: > >>On December 25, 2005 at 19:58:16, gerold daniels wrote: >> >>>On December 25, 2005 at 18:57:37, Dadi Jonsson wrote: >>> >>>>On December 25, 2005 at 18:47:01, Fernando Villegas wrote: >>>> >>>>>Some alternatives has been examined, but at last it seems the weight of habitude >>>>>will get the upper hand. >>>>>Lot of people simply does not want even to listen of any change in this. >>>> >>>>I think I know what you are saying and its not good. At least I tried to offer >>>>something much better, but since others don't agree so be it. >>>> >>>>>As they say: if it is not broken....etc >>>> >>>>But it is badly broken. >>> >>>I don't think it is broken. I like it the way it is. >>> >>>Gerold. >> >>The horse and buggy were pretty cool, too. :-) > > >But some of us have been doing this for 7 years (or soemting). > >It's not just because we are old and stupid, that we have kept it the way it is >- clean and simple. It's because it just works. We can concentrate on the >content, not the form. > >You don't have to be "modern", just because you can. Adding more colors, fancier >fonts, more graphics, or threads moving around, doesn't seem like an improvement >to me. > > >Bo Persson Persuasive but having at least the ability of new posts drive threads up is good for increasing the communication amongst people and decreasing the amount of searching through the haystack...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.