Author: Mike van Rooyen
Date: 10:59:07 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 13:16:44, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 13:11:56, Mike van Rooyen wrote: > >>Looking at the Hiarcs 10 games posted here,especially the Nunn Test games vs >>Fritz 9 I am dissapointed! Many talk about Hiarcs's human style however I am not >>convinced. Fritz 9 understands most positions much better than Hiarcs.The close >>result of the Nunn matches is more due to its tactical ability rather than its >>positional understanding.It plays many computer-like moves whereas Fritz 9 plays >>very human-like moves. >>What do you think? > >1) You have been reading too much propaganda. > >2) ChessBase Fritz propaganda department >> Marc Uniacke propagada department > >-- >GCP All I'm saying is that Fritz 9 plays better posional chess than Hiarcs 10 in most positions.I read the propaganda just like you but I am a fairly useful player myself and I can make my own mind up based on the evidence!
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.