Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs 10 observations

Author: George Tsavdaris

Date: 11:21:24 12/26/05

Go up one level in this thread

On December 26, 2005 at 14:06:40, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>nonsense

 Actually that kind of conversations are useless and don't contibute to any
positive thing.....
 You should give examples that contradict Mike's statement, while Mike should
give examples that follow his statement.... None of you gave even a single fact,
only personal opinions not even detailed ones.....

• Re: Hiarcs 10 observations: examples pgn (long post) Thorsten Czub 13:15:37 12/26/05
• Re: Hiarcs 10 observations Gian-Carlo Pascutto 11:50:57 12/26/05
  • Re: Hiarcs 10 observations Mike van Rooyen 14:51:32 12/26/05
  • Re: Hiarcs 10 observations paul bedrey 12:37:01 12/26/05
    • Re: Hiarcs 10 observations Zappa 12:52:25 12/26/05
      • Re: Hiarcs 10 observations Joseph Ciarrochi 13:23:47 12/26/05
        • Re: Hiarcs 10 observations Jay Urbanski 17:59:12 12/26/05
      • Re: Hiarcs 10 observations Sune Larsson 13:07:58 12/26/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.