Author: paul bedrey
Date: 12:37:01 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 14:50:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 14:21:24, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On December 26, 2005 at 14:06:40, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>nonsense >> >> Actually that kind of conversations are useless and don't contibute to any >>positive thing..... >> You should give examples that contradict Mike's statement, while Mike should >>give examples that follow his statement.... None of you gave even a single fact, >>only personal opinions not even detailed ones..... > >How does one OBJECTIVELY verify what is "humanlike style" (and all similar >claims) and what is not? > >You can't. > >That's why it is propaganda. What about a testsuite of positions marked !! by grandmaster commentators(would have to include 100's of positions). Chessbase includes a database with medals and analysis by various anointaters. Also some Chess magazines include high quality analysis by grandmasters like Karpov and Anand. Can't get more human then that, plus they are verified. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.