Author: Zappa
Date: 12:52:25 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 15:37:01, paul bedrey wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 14:50:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On December 26, 2005 at 14:21:24, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On December 26, 2005 at 14:06:40, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>nonsense >>> >>> Actually that kind of conversations are useless and don't contibute to any >>>positive thing..... >>> You should give examples that contradict Mike's statement, while Mike should >>>give examples that follow his statement.... None of you gave even a single fact, >>>only personal opinions not even detailed ones..... >> >>How does one OBJECTIVELY verify what is "humanlike style" (and all similar >>claims) and what is not? >> >>You can't. >> >>That's why it is propaganda. > >What about a testsuite of positions marked !! by grandmaster commentators(would >have to include 100's of positions). Chessbase includes a database with medals >and analysis by various anointaters. Also some Chess magazines include high >quality analysis by grandmasters like Karpov and Anand. >Can't get more human then that, plus they are verified. >> >>-- >>GCP Nah, I'm with GCP on this one. "Humanlike" is simply not a very scientific term. I mean, I could say that Zappa is humanlike if it hangs a piece :) anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.