Author: Mike van Rooyen
Date: 14:58:47 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 16:01:56, Peter Eizenhammer wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 13:11:56, Mike van Rooyen wrote: > >>Looking at the Hiarcs 10 games posted here,especially the Nunn Test games vs >>Fritz 9 I am dissapointed! Many talk about Hiarcs's human style however I am not >>convinced. Fritz 9 understands most positions much better than Hiarcs.The close >>result of the Nunn matches is more due to its tactical ability rather than its >>positional understanding.It plays many computer-like moves whereas Fritz 9 plays >>very human-like moves. >>What do you think? >>Mike > >hello Mike, > >I dont have Hiarcs 10 yet, but for Fritz9 I would agree that it is >very strong in positional understanding and that its game play looks very "human >like". >So your observation may be blamed on the strength of Fritz more than on a >weakness of Hiarcs. > >Peter Thanks for your observations! Play through games between the two and you will see what I mean. In the Nunn test Hiarcs often does not have a clue compared to Fritz9.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.