Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 18:48:43 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 21:40:14, Graham Banks wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 21:24:50, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>If you take a look at the individual stats (click engine name) you will see that >>worst ELO performance is against some engines where we still have few games >>(Jonny, Ktulu, Gandalf) and we also played many games against Rybka versions and >>Deep Shredder 2CPU 512 MB and Shredder 9 with ELO performance below average. So >>my guess would be that rating will increase as soon as we covered a wider >>spectrum of opponents. I prefer to have at least 2000 games to take any >>conclusions. >> >>We have diverse settings for Fruit, Shredder, Rybka. So it would be fair enough >>to test also Hiarcs with an alternative setting. Anyone can explain me what is >>influenced by the hypermodern setting? Any results available here? >> >>Best Regards >>Heinz > > >Hello Heinz, > >all I know is that if you use hypermodern, it is also advised to use aggressive >with it for best results. I'm sure Harvey will correct me if I'm wrong, > >Regards, Graham. No -- that is incorrect. It is an option to use both -- but it is Thorsten's feeling that they must be used together. I do not find this the strongest setting in my tests. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.