Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 19:00:06 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 21:48:43, enrico carrisco wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 21:40:14, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On December 26, 2005 at 21:24:50, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>If you take a look at the individual stats (click engine name) you will see that >>>worst ELO performance is against some engines where we still have few games >>>(Jonny, Ktulu, Gandalf) and we also played many games against Rybka versions and >>>Deep Shredder 2CPU 512 MB and Shredder 9 with ELO performance below average. So >>>my guess would be that rating will increase as soon as we covered a wider >>>spectrum of opponents. I prefer to have at least 2000 games to take any >>>conclusions. >>> >>>We have diverse settings for Fruit, Shredder, Rybka. So it would be fair enough >>>to test also Hiarcs with an alternative setting. Anyone can explain me what is >>>influenced by the hypermodern setting? Any results available here? >>> >>>Best Regards >>>Heinz >> >> >>Hello Heinz, >> >>all I know is that if you use hypermodern, it is also advised to use aggressive >>with it for best results. I'm sure Harvey will correct me if I'm wrong, >> >>Regards, Graham. > >No -- that is incorrect. It is an option to use both -- but it is Thorsten's >feeling that they must be used together. I do not find this the strongest >setting in my tests. > >-elc. Hi Enrico, okay, opinions differ as usual. I will try and play a bit, first with normal and hypermodern, then maybe with aggressive and hypermodern. If one of those looks promising tests will continue over many games hopefully. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.