Author: Graham Banks
Date: 19:35:16 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2005 at 22:08:30, enrico carrisco wrote: >On December 26, 2005 at 22:00:06, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >>On December 26, 2005 at 21:48:43, enrico carrisco wrote: >> >>>On December 26, 2005 at 21:40:14, Graham Banks wrote: >>> >>>>On December 26, 2005 at 21:24:50, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi all, >>>>> >>>>>If you take a look at the individual stats (click engine name) you will see that >>>>>worst ELO performance is against some engines where we still have few games >>>>>(Jonny, Ktulu, Gandalf) and we also played many games against Rybka versions and >>>>>Deep Shredder 2CPU 512 MB and Shredder 9 with ELO performance below average. So >>>>>my guess would be that rating will increase as soon as we covered a wider >>>>>spectrum of opponents. I prefer to have at least 2000 games to take any >>>>>conclusions. >>>>> >>>>>We have diverse settings for Fruit, Shredder, Rybka. So it would be fair enough >>>>>to test also Hiarcs with an alternative setting. Anyone can explain me what is >>>>>influenced by the hypermodern setting? Any results available here? >>>>> >>>>>Best Regards >>>>>Heinz >>>> >>>> >>>>Hello Heinz, >>>> >>>>all I know is that if you use hypermodern, it is also advised to use aggressive >>>>with it for best results. I'm sure Harvey will correct me if I'm wrong, >>>> >>>>Regards, Graham. >>> >>>No -- that is incorrect. It is an option to use both -- but it is Thorsten's >>>feeling that they must be used together. I do not find this the strongest >>>setting in my tests. >>> >>>-elc. >> >>Hi Enrico, >> >>okay, opinions differ as usual. I will try and play a bit, first with normal and >>hypermodern, then maybe with aggressive and hypermodern. If one of those looks >>promising tests will continue over many games hopefully. >> >>Best Regards >>Heinz > >Hello Heinz -- I will respond to your email when I arrive home. I can say, >however, that Mark shares my opinion on the possibilities of Hypermodern by >itself but not combined with aggressive. > >Regards, > >-elc. If it's good enough for Mark, then I'm not arguing! :-) Better go with hypermodern and normal Heinz, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.