Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 19:57:57 12/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
> >If it's good enough for Mark, then I'm not arguing! :-) >Better go with hypermodern and normal Heinz, > >Graham. Hi Graham, I think we will first collect some data with hypermodern and normal and see how it works. First games here are promising. Studying our rating table I think it will also be useful to add a database with best version only and only the games played between them. Hiarcs for example is punished several time by having relatively poor results against Rybka versions and also against Deep Shredder and Shredder. I will give such a ratinglist in a few days and we can compare if there are distortions. Such a list should be additionally, because playing exactly the same amount of games for all against all and no experiments with settings is also nothing most CEGT testers would like. And there is still the chance to find a very good setting and maybe give the authors some clues. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.