Author: James Robertson
Date: 09:49:12 03/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 1999 at 04:21:03, blass uri wrote: > >On March 29, 1999 at 04:10:18, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>On March 29, 1999 at 02:22:48, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On March 28, 1999 at 14:29:45, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers >>>>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>>>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>>>> 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363 >>>>> 1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457 >>>>> 3 Hiarcs 7.0 64MB P200 MMX 2567 28 -27 676 63% 2471 >>>>> 4 Nimzo 99 64MB P200 MMX 2565 37 -35 390 63% 2472 >>>>> 5 Fritz 5.0 PB29% 67MB P200 MMX 2564 24 -23 946 67% 2436 >>>>> 6 Junior 5.0 64MB P200 MMX 2543 30 -29 576 63% 2447 >>>>> 7 Hiarcs 6.0 48MB P200 MMX 2524 25 -25 802 57% 2473 >>>>> 8 Nimzo 98 57MB P200 MMX 2523 24 -23 899 59% 2459 >>>>> 9 Rebel 9.0 46MB P200 MMX 2522 25 -24 843 62% 2437 >>>>> 10 Rebel 8.0 46MB P200 MMX 2507 31 -30 533 58% 2448 >>>>> 11 MChess Pro 6.0 41MB P200 MMX 2506 28 -28 637 57% 2453 >>>>> 12 MChess Pro 7.1 42MB P200 MMX 2505 24 -24 834 56% 2460 >>>>> 13 Shredder 2.0 57MB P200 MMX 2502 25 -25 765 55% 2464 >>>>> 14 Genius 5.0 DOS 44MB P200 MMX 2495 24 -23 883 56% 2449 >>>>> 15 MChess Pro 8.0 64MB P200 MMX 2481 30 -29 560 53% 2456 >>>> >>>>Why is the number in the last column < 2400 for CM6K and > 2400 for everything >>>>else? >>>>bruce >>> >>>Because it played the following opponents where some have a low rating: >>> >>> 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX, 2576 >>> >>>Fritz532 P200 2-1 Hiarcs7 P200X 0.5-1.5 Junior5 P200X 2-0 >>>MCP 8 P200MMX 1-1 Rebel 8.0 P90 9.5-7.5 Rebel 9.0 P90 1-0 >>>Hiarcs 6 P90 16.5-5.5 Geniu4 486/66 8.5-2.5 Fritz 3.0 P90 1.5-0.5 >>>Fritz3 486/66 19-1 SPARC 20 MHz 16-2 >> >> >> >>Dear Mr. Faber, >> >>Just as I suspected!!!! Sounds like a con-job to me. CM6000 IS NOT worthy of >>the first place position.. Play the #$#%%# games with equal processors or don't >>even waste our time. There is nothing useful here. Ninety two of the games out >>of one hundred were played on vastly inferior hardware. > >only 91 out of 100 > > And Mike Tyson can beat >>up my little sister too. > >Rating in chess is based on games between not equal players and chessmaster6000 >won 5.5:3.5 in the games against p200MMX programs and only lost elo because of >games against weaker opponents. > >If you win Rebel8(p90) 9.5:7.5 then you lose elo. > >Chessmaster is one of the top programs. > >I am not sure that is the best(there are not enough games to say) but you cannot >decide that chessmaster does not deserve number 1 because of the fact that it >played against weaker opponents. > >Chessmaster did 78% when Fritz532 did 66%. >They have the same rating because the calculation of the rating considered the >fact that chessmaster played against weaker opponents. > >Uri Well said. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.