Author: James Robertson
Date: 09:53:02 03/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 1999 at 16:03:08, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >I'm impressed with the performance of CM6K, although I believe that the first >position is somewhat overrated. I think between place 5-10 is more realistic. >And that's an upgrade already from my former opinion, rating it somewhere >between place 5-15. > >I played Fritz5.32 against CM6K at a fixed ply depth and they drawed. But Fritz >5.32 only took 2 minutes and CM6K took an hour (59 minutes) to complete the >game. I know that node speed isn't everything there is, but given the same >tactical insight the fastest engine will be the best. Or are there different >opinions? > >My system is a P2@400MHz with 128Mb SDRAM. Why on earth is one game convincing you that CM6k is worse? The very first 40/2 game my program played against TCB it won. Does that mean that it is better? After several more games, I very quickly I found that it does not. James > >Jeroen ;-}
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.