Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 05:43:53 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 08:36:24, JNoomen wrote: >Hi all, > >It's quite possible that the computerchess lists show something like this at the >end of the year: > >1. Rybka 32-bit >2. Fruit 2.2.1 >3. Fritz 9 >4. Shredder 9 >5. Hiarcs 10 Hiarcs 10 is ranked higher in this list. Maybe no. 2 or 3. So it should look like this: 1.Rybka 2.Fruit 2.2.1 3.Zappa 2.1b 4.Hiarc 10 5.Hydra 6.Fritz 9 7.Shredder 9 But things will change very soon, the development is now in a breathless speed. TL > >Now suppose we enter Hydra and Zappa in these lists. Condition: they both play >on the SAME hardware as the above 5. So no program has a hardware advantage. All >programs use their own book. > >Now comes the poll question: where do you think that Hydra and Zappa will be in >the list given above? > >Of course I am especially interested in the views of Chrilly and Anthony :-). > >Best wishes to you all, > >Jeroen > > >PS I called it 'another poll' as Marc Lacrosse had a nice one on the final >standings of Paderborn
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.