Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:33:40 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 11:22:36, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >On December 27, 2005 at 09:28:02, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I wonder why the fruit operator agreed to early draw against isichess. >> >>public Fruit evaluates the final position as more than +3 for white >> >[...] > >Hello Uri, > >I think you should accept this handling by the operator, because: > >1. You don't have the same Hardware > >2. You don't have the same version and you don't know the changes. > >3. You don't see IsiChess score and you're not in the hall (live). > >4. You can't only compare Fruit 2.2.1 analyses (missed IsiChess here). > >If you really completly disagree with the draw maybe ask Fabien if you could >overtake the operator part of Fruit :) > >Best, >Daniel You are right but I do not claim that fruit could win but only that it had practical chances to win and I am disappointed from the fact that the game did not continue(operators could not know the future moves of the game without playing them and if we ignore winning on time only draw and win for white seem to be possible) I also do not claim that the computer moves that I give are forced. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.