Author: rait
Date: 09:43:33 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 09:45:59, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On December 27, 2005 at 09:42:20, Yuriy Lyapko wrote: > >>On December 27, 2005 at 09:33:48, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Here is the diagram when draw was accepted >>>[D]8/3k1b2/2r2P1Q/K3p3/4P3/8/8/8 w - - 0 118 >>> >>>Fruit made no progress for many moves but clearly had chances to win the game. >>>There was no reason not to continue the game unless there was a danger of losing >>>on time. >>> >>>Time control was 2 hours per game and I expect the operator to assume 20 minutes >>>of operator time and playing 200 moves in 20 minutes should be no problem so >>>there should be no problem of losing on time. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Sorry Uri, but a final position is an easy draw for black even for me (~2100 >>ELO). >>Looking at the PGN I see that last capture was on move 78, so here are only 10 >>moves to 50-move draw... >> >>Best regards, >>George > >I absolutly agree. I think Uri should excuse himself by Fruit´s operator. > >TL To Yuri im ~2200 ELO myself but if im going to play against top program Imnot 100 protsent sure this is going to be draw . To TL why Uri must excuse it s not 100 % sure game is draw so why not to move next ten moves if you have played 40 ? Programs can play differently at end of 50 move rule . Rait
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.