Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:10:42 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 14:42:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 27, 2005 at 14:07:47, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>But guessing is not better than measuring (in the absense of data.) > >Measuring is not even an option - so this comparison is invalid. There is a box with some interesting mineral in it. Through a tiny pinhole, the owner of the box showed us what happened when he rattled the box with some other minerals in it. It looked like the mineral might be pretty hard, but we are not sure about it. So is the hardness unknown? To a large degree of certainty, yes. It is unknown. But the owner of the box can always open it. So measurements are not impossible. Only improbable. The mystical value of his hidden treasure may diminish if other minerals turn out to be harder. So far as I know, it has not yet been dismantled like another famous chess machine. So measurements may come some day. >>My point is that the guess does not establish anything of merit or value, except >>to see how people feel about it. > >I guess I agree with that :) > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.