Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 12:26:57 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 15:05:59, stuart taylor wrote: >Is there a consensus of opinion that the 1997 Deep Blue, the way it was, was >weak compared to certain things today, the way they are? And if not anything >else, atleast Hydra? >And if Hydra is something so special, then why are there no big challenges >against it? >S.Taylor Deep Blue would not even get 2500 SSDF.The reason there are no challenges against Hydra is clear:Just look at the 2 Bilbao match results 3.5 out of 8 in 2004 and 4 out of 8 in 2005:Here some simple Math the sum of both scores in two years 7.5 does not even equal 8.Human GMs (or anybody else) are simply too weak to pose a seroius challenge to the programs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.