Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 12:27:53 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 14:47:55, Joachim Rang wrote:
>On December 27, 2005 at 13:59:24, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On December 27, 2005 at 13:54:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>This is the game from playchess
>>>Note that the last move is of black so I think that the only player that could
>>>lose on time is white.
>>>
>>>[Event "Blitz:110'"]
>>>[Site "Uni-Paderborn"]
>>>[Date "2005.12.27"]
>>>[Round "?"]
>>>[White "Zappa"]
>>>[Black "Fruit 05/11/03"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[ECO "A85"]
>>>[Annotator "Tscheuschner"]
>>>[PlyCount "24"]
>>>[EventDate "2005.??.??"]
>>>[TimeControl "6600"]
>>>
>>>{512MB, SCHACH03} 1. d4 {0} e6 {-0.01/1 0} 2. c4 {14} f5 {-0.01/1 0} 3. Nc3 {
>>>(g3) 8} Nf6 {-0.01/1 0} 4. Nf3 {13} Bb4 {-0.01/1 0} 5. Qb3 {11} a5 {-0.01/1 0}
>>>6. g3 {12} b6 {-0.01/1 0} 7. Bg2 {9} Bb7 {-0.01/1 0} 8. O-O {11} O-O {-0.01/1 0
>>>} 9. Bg5 {(Td1) 13} Bxc3 {0.11/17 348} 10. Qxc3 {14} Ne4 {0.07/18 303} 11. Bxd8
>>>{(De3) 207} Nxc3 {0.09/17 73} 12. bxc3 {105} Rxd8 {
>>>black loses on time... 0.09/19 0} 1-0
>>>
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>chessbase is a bad site
>>
>>Here is the game
>>Again bad job of the operator of fruit
>>
>>It seems that he did not learn to use more operator time based on experience
>>against isichess.
>>
>>
>>[Event "Blitz:5'"]
>>[Site "Uni-Paderborn"]
>>[Date "2005.12.27"]
>>[Round "2"]
>>[White "Zappa"]
>>[Black "Fruit"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "A85"]
>>[PlyCount "289"]
>>[TimeControl "300"]
>>
>>1. d4 e6 2.
>>c4 f5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3
>>Bb4 5. Qb3 a5 6. g3 b6 7. Bg2 Bb7 8. O-O O-O 9. Bg5 Bxc3 10. Qxc3 Ne4 11. Bxd8
>>Nxc3 12. bxc3 Rxd8 13. Rfd1 d6 14. Ng5 Bxg2 15. Kxg2 Re8 16. d5 e5 17. Ne6 Ra7
>>18. Kf3 Nd7 19. e4 fxe4+ 20. Kxe4 Nf8 21. Nxf8 Rxf8 22. f3 Raa8 23. h4 Kf7 24.
>>Rd2 Ke7 25. Rf1 Kd7 26. Rdf2 Rae8 27. Rd2 Rf6 28. Rdf2 Rg6 29. Rg1 Rf8 30. Re2
>>Ke7 31. Rgg2 Kd8 32. Rg1 Kd7 33. Ree1 Rgf6 34. Rgf1 Re8 35. Re2 Rg6 36. Rg1 Rd8
>>37. Rf2 Rc8 38. Re2 Rh6 39. Rf1 Rf8 40. Rff2 Rg6 41. Rg2 Ke7 42. Rg1 Rgf6 43.
>>Rf1 Kd8 44. Ke3 Kd7 45. Rg2 Ke7 46. Re2 Rg6 47. Rg1 Rff6 48. Ke4 Rf7 49. Rgg2
>>Kd7 50. Rg1 Rgf6 51. Rf1 Rh6 52. Rg2 Rg6 53. Rfg1 Rgf6 54. Rf1 Kd8 55. Rff2 Rf8
>>56. Rg1 Ke7 57. Ke3 R8f7 58. Rff1 Kd7 59. Ke4 h6 60. Rh1 Rf8 61. Rf2 Rg6 62. Rg2
>>Rf7 63. Re1 Ke7 64. Ke3 Ke8 65. Reg1 Kd8 66. Ke4 Rgf6 67. Rf1 Kd7 68. Ke3 Ke8
>>69. Rd2 Kd8 70. Rh2 Rg6 71. Rg1 Ke7 72. Rhg2 Rf5 73. Ke4 Rf8 74. Re1 Kd8 75. Rh1
>>Kd7 76. Re1 Rgf6 77. Rf1 Re8 78. Rgf2 Rg6 79. Rg1 Rf8 80. Re2 Rgf6 81. Rf1 a4
>>82. a3 Rg6 83. Rg1 Rf7 84. Rh2 Rgf6 85. Rf1 h5 86. Re2 Rf5 87. Rg2 Rf8 88. Rh2
>>R5f6 89. Re2 Ra8 90. Rg2 Rc8 91. Rb1 g6 92. Rgb2 Rf5 93. Rf1 Rcf8 94. Rh2 R8f7
>>95. Rhh1 Kd8 96. Rf2 Ke8 97. Rg1 Kd7 98. Ke3 Rh7 99. Rh1 Re7 100. Rb1 g5 101.
>>Rh1 gxh4 102. Rxh4 Rg7 103. Rh3 Rfg5 104. Rg2 Rf7 105. Ke4 Rf8 106. Rgh2 Rg7
>>107. Rg2 Rgf7 108. Rf2 Rg8 109. Ke3 Re7 110. Rg2 Rg5 111. Ke4 Re8 112. Rg1 Rf8
>>113. Ke3 Rf7 114. Rgh1 Rg8 115. Rg1 Rf5 116. Ke4 Rgf8 117. Rf1 Rg5 118. Ke3 Kd8
>>119. Rf2 Rfg8 120. Rg2 Ke7 121. Ke4 Kd7 122. Rg1 Kc8 123. Ke3 Kb7 124. Kd3 c6
>>125. Ke4 Rc8 126. Kd3 Rf8 127. g4 Rfg8 128. Rhg3 Kc7 129. Ke4 R8g7 130. Ke3 R5g6
>>131. g5 h4 132. Rg4 Rh7 133. Rh1 h3 134. f4 exf4+ 135. Kxf4 Kd7 136. Kf5 Rg8
>>137. g6 Rf8+ 138. Kg5 Re7 139. dxc6+ Kxc6 140. Rg3 h2 141. Rg2 Re5+ 142. Kh6
>>Rh8+ 143. Kg7 Reh5 144. Rf2 R8h6 145. Rf3 1-0
>
>
>Hi Uri,
>
>I'm sorry that you are disappointed about bad luck by Fruit. We participate in
>Paderborn this year just as a "supportive player" and have no ambitions for
>first place (although we would not mind getting it by luck). We are even using
>only the tournament-standard-PC which is iirc only a P4 3 GHz and therefore very
>slow. In order to compete for the first place we would have needed a deep beta
>which is not yet ready. With Rybka participating on 64Bit and Zappa we felt that
>we have no real chances (although we've made some progress in software I doubted
>it would be enough). Thomas Sauerwald offered to operate Fruit in order to make
>an interesting tourney and we agreed. He is certainly not an experienced
>operator and therefore a loss on time can happen - I doubt he has ever operated
>a program in a game with that many moves. Fruit uses time quite aggressive so in
>the end there was probably no time left.
>
>Well it's certainly a pity to loose on time in a drawn positions but that's
>live.
>
>Joachim
well 145 moves is a hell of a lot for an operator.
anyway, we can discuss the game in 2 ways. Objective and subjective.
Let's discuss the subjective way; what will happen is black will eat all white
pawns and white will win a rook. Zappa like a true program will of course do
anything to win that rook.
Then it is KPPPKR.
With the white king on g8 i doubt whether white can draw it. perhaps he can,
who knows?
I know many players who like to try that with black against a computer :)
Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.