Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New Aktueller Test [HIARCS 10]

Author: enrico carrisco

Date: 12:51:15 12/27/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 27, 2005 at 15:47:16, Zappa wrote:

>On December 27, 2005 at 15:23:30, enrico carrisco wrote:
>
>>On December 27, 2005 at 15:19:00, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>On December 27, 2005 at 15:14:33, enrico carrisco wrote:
>>>
>>>>I didn't see this posted yet but I also didn't look extensively.  :)
>>>>
>>>
>>>I see the plays on playchess.com! :-)
>>
>>Well, that speaks worlds to me...  Inconsistent server results with varied
>>speeds of hardware, time controls and openings vs. scientific testing with
>>controlled conditions.  And you prefer to base your opinions on the former.
>>
>>Well, I guess that about sums it up.
>>
>>-elc.
>
>For what its worth, Enrico, I doubt Eduard's posts have much of an effect on
>Hiarcs' reputation or sales.  The number of people that read CCC is too small
>for that.
>
>anthony

No, of course Anthony.  I agree with your "CCC geek-sqaud" analogy, but it
doesn't remove the irritation factor of such posts...

Good luck in Paderborn -- I'm excited to see those final scaling figures when
everything calms down.  Are you still at 128 CPUs like your initial estimate?

Regards,

-elc.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.