Author: blass uri
Date: 15:08:28 03/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 1999 at 13:33:20, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: >In short, I believe the premise of this thread is somewhat flawed. Crafty has >not (against humans) been demonstrated to be significantly weaker than anything >else, especially at speed. The results of mark young showed that Hiarcs7 is better than parallel crafty at 10 min+20 seconds or faster time control(5+5 to 5+12) Here are the results by mark young: Results: Matches with Bob Hyatt. Hiarcs7(PII450) Vs. Crafty(Quad Xeon PII 400) Hiarcs7 wins +5 -2 =1 TC 10min 20 sec incs. Server games with Hiarcs7 against Crafty. TC - Blitz from 5 min 5 sec incs. to 5 min 12 sec. incs. Hiarcs7(PII 450) wins +28 -5 =7 Avg. speed of the crafty's per game was 668 MHz. Most games were against multi-cpu Crafty's. If crafty is not weaker then how do you explain the result of mark young against crafty? Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.