Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 02:12:18 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 03:38:10, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >I have been evaluating rybka's endgame play using sune larson's endgame >testsuite. So far, Rybka does not seem to be significantly worse than fruit >2.2.1 or fritz 9 > >time control 40 minutes 4 sec increment > >Rybka versus fritz 9 (played on Pentium 3) >Rybka versus fruit 2.2.1 (Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz with 1,023 MB Memory) > > >Record on the 9 nunn endgame positions (engines playing both sides) > win loss draw >Rybka versus fruit 2.2.1 3 5 10 >Rybka versus fritz9 4 5 9 > >So rybka's endgame is not up to the rest of its playing level, but i would not >classify it as weak, as many have suggested. True, it is not the best. > > if i was in paderborn, and playing against rybka, i would certainly play an >opening that is likely to lead to an early endgame. > >best >Joseph Hi Joseph, could you post these games please? Was this 40 min+4 sec for the whole game? regards sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.